过程是如此的艰辛
IT人的历史往往伴随着追捧软件最新版本的历史
当年大家都有MSDOS 3.3的软盘，最好是3.31的
除了经典的3.3，还要有高版本MSDOS，从5.0到6.0，到6.2，到6.22
后来是Windows 3.1，PWindows 3.2。记得Windows 95出来的时候，我在上海郊区，
虽然是上海，但却是郊区，信息不够发达，连盗版盘都不知道去哪买。哈尔滨的同学特快专递给我
一张Windows 95的光盘。
再后来是Windows 98，Windows ME。Windows 2000从Beta版开始用来架Web Server。
迷上Linux后就是RH 5.2，RH 6.0，RH 6.4，RH 7.0，RH 9.0，Fedora，Mandrake，SUSE，GENTOO，Debian，Ubuntu，一路走来
现在是OSX。
迷上MAC比较晚，用上已经是Tiger了。然后就盼着花豹。
买正版是不太可能了，一直等着下载。
等BT下载了几天，Azureus报告磁盘读写错误。
重新下载。
极慢。
看到有D5的下载，赶紧放弃D9的。
D5的下完，是spaseimage格式。GOOGLE之。先转成DMG格式，再转成ISO格式。
烧盘。启动。启不来。
上论坛问别人，没有答案。
再烧一张，还是如此。
直接上淘宝买一张D9，安装。
耗时一晚上，终于安装成功。
继续安装Optional Installation，失败，失败，失败。Installation Disk Damage。
气愤！！！
LP问我，新版本有什么新功能？
我答曰：你看，多了好多新壁纸耶。
来自Robert Love的Blog
And Google Analytics does operating system statistics, too:
* Windows 57%
* Linux 32%
* Mac OS X 11%
# Firefox 61%
# Internet Explorer 25%
# Mozilla SeaMonkey 5%
# Safari 3%
# Opera 2%
看来hacker和关注hacker的人中用linux和firefox的人还是很多
好多网上的文档都过期了
像
git pull http://xxx.xxx/xxx.git出现
error: pick-rref: HEAD not found
的错误，没有一个网页是有价值的
其实只要在该目录中直接git pull就可以了
对双方对业界都是一个好事。对montavista，争取一个大客户而且该大客户本来就是一个非常有实力的竞争对手。对access来说，节约了成本，专注在自己擅长的方向。对业界来说，access出货变快了可以使linux占领更大的市场。尤其是在moto开始三心二意的当下。
除了需要fontconfig-voodoo -f -s zh_CN之外，还要
sudo fc-cache -f -v
大概是某些config文件没有Yes覆盖而是保留原来的结果
Re: Which companies are helping developing the kernel
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Greg KH
To: Alistair John Strachan
Cc: Stefan Heinrichsen ,
Subject: Re: Which companies are helping developing the kernel
Date: Sunday, October 14, 2007 – 5:59 pm
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 11:28:46PM +0100, Alistair John Strachan wrote:
quoted text
> On Sunday 14 October 2007 23:06:22 Stefan Heinrichsen wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I posted this question at comp.linux.misc and where told this would be a > > better place therefore. I would like to do a internship in the field of the > > Linux kernel. > > Can someone tell me where to find a list of companies (don’t matter in > > which country) that employ kernel developers? > > I think Greg wrote a paper on this subject, so I’ve added him to CC in case he > has the link handy.
Yeah, but my paper didn’t really track companies very well. The lwn.net
article is the best, and below is my version of who did things in
2.6.23. Note, the lack of a company is not an indicator that they did
nothing, just that I could not easily determine someone worked for them.
I’ll try to send out my “who are you working for” emails in a week or so
to see if I can further categorize the “unknowns”.
thanks,
greg k-h
————————-
Processed 7075 csets from 992 developers
126 employers found
Top changeset contributors by employer
(Unknown) 1116 (15.8%)
(None) 843 (11.9%)
Red Hat 827 (11.7%)
IBM 557 (7.9%)
Linux Foundation 528 (7.5%)
Novell 449 (6.3%)
Intel 242 (3.4%)
Oracle 158 (2.2%)
MIPS Technologies 143 (2.0%)
Nokia 133 (1.9%)
NetApp 119 (1.7%)
NTT 99 (1.4%)
Astaro 97 (1.4%)
MontaVista 90 (1.3%)
(Consultant) 86 (1.2%)
SGI 84 (1.2%)
Qumranet 74 (1.0%)
QLogic 70 (1.0%)
(Academia) 70 (1.0%)
SWsoft 64 (0.9%)
Analog Devices 61 (0.9%)
HP 60 (0.8%)
Sony 59 (0.8%)
rPath 56 (0.8%)
XenSource 53 (0.7%)
CERN 49 (0.7%)
CC Computer Consultants 48 (0.7%)
Freescale 47 (0.7%)
Fujitsu 47 (0.7%)
Tripeaks 46 (0.7%)
linutronix 44 (0.6%)
Snapgear 39 (0.6%)
Simtec 34 (0.5%)
Atmel 28 (0.4%)
Google 28 (0.4%)
Cisco 27 (0.4%)
Toshiba 25 (0.4%)
Broadcom 25 (0.4%)
SteelEye 24 (0.3%)
Renesas Technology 23 (0.3%)
Mellanox 21 (0.3%)
LSI Logic 17 (0.2%)
Adaptec 16 (0.2%)
Wipro 15 (0.2%)
Marvell 14 (0.2%)
Miracle Linux 14 (0.2%)
Solid Boot Ltd. 14 (0.2%)
AMD 12 (0.2%)
Hitachi 11 (0.2%)
ARM 11 (0.2%)
Canonical 10 (0.1%)
XIV Information Systems 9 (0.1%)
OpenedHand 9 (0.1%)
Open Grid Computing 9 (0.1%)
Veritas 8 (0.1%)
Secretlab 7 (0.1%)
Neterion 7 (0.1%)
Katalix Systems 7 (0.1%)
SANPeople 7 (0.1%)
Digi International 7 (0.1%)
Znyx Networks 6 (0.1%)
Wind River 6 (0.1%)
NEC 6 (0.1%)
Wolfson Microelectronics 6 (0.1%)
SUNY Computer Science 6 (0.1%)
NetXen 6 (0.1%)
NVidia 6 (0.1%)
Myricom 6 (0.1%)
Chelsio 5 (0.1%)
Realtek 5 (0.1%)
IPUnity-Glenayre 5 (0.1%)
Linux Networx 5 (0.1%)
Barco 4 (0.1%)
SIOS Technology 4 (0.1%)
MIPS 4 (0.1%)
University of Aberdeen 4 (0.1%)
PiKRON s.r.o 4 (0.1%)
Pardus 4 (0.1%)
Crash Barrier 4 (0.1%)
Tresys 4 (0.1%)
ClusterFS 4 (0.1%)
Macq Electronique 3 (0.0%)
OLPC 3 (0.0%)
CompuLab 3 (0.0%)
DENX Software Engineering 3 (0.0%)
Embedded Alley Solutions 3 (0.0%)
Twin Sun 3 (0.0%)
Transmode Systems 3 (0.0%)
Cosmosbay~Vectis 3 (0.0%)
Pengutronix 2 (0.0%)
Sierra Wireless 2 (0.0%)
Real-Time Remedies 2 (0.0%)
Bull 2 (0.0%)
ScaleMP Inc. 2 (0.0%)
Samsung 2 (0.0%)
MicroGate Systems 2 (0.0%)
Atomide 2 (0.0%)
US National Security Agency 2 (0.0%)
VMWare 2 (0.0%)
Verismo 2 (0.0%)
Akamai Technologies 2 (0.0%)
CE Linux Forum 2 (0.0%)
Siemens 1 (0.0%)
ONELAN 1 (0.0%)
Xorcom 1 (0.0%)
EXOSEC 1 (0.0%)
LWN.net 1 (0.0%)
Texas Instruments 1 (0.0%)
Promise Technology 1 (0.0%)
VA Linux Systems Japan 1 (0.0%)
University of Sevilla 1 (0.0%)
Motorola 1 (0.0%)
HES-SO Valais Wallis 1 (0.0%)
SYSGO 1 (0.0%)
Via 1 (0.0%)
Telecom-Service 1 (0.0%)
Hauppauge 1 (0.0%)
DSA 1 (0.0%)
Vivecode 1 (0.0%)
Mandriva 1 (0.0%)
ATRON electronic 1 (0.0%)
Cytronics & Melware 1 (0.0%)
M&N Solutions 1 (0.0%)
Rockwell 1 (0.0%)
8D Technologies 1 (0.0%)
University of Cambridge 1 (0.0%)
没听说过以下公司：
Tripeaks, Emulex, rPath, Solid Boot, PMC-Sierra, Astaro
王安是我知道的第一个电脑公司的名字，好像是八十年代初CCTV搞的智力竞赛，赵老师忠祥主持，王安电脑公司作为华人在美国成功的代表，组队参赛，好像拿了个第二（？）。我当时还不知道电脑是个啥东西。
苹果大概是我知道的第二个电脑公司的名字，因为风传所在的中学花巨资买了两台“苹果二”电脑，放在专用的机房里当宝贝供着，只有某专职老师和校长公子可以进去使用。我甚至都没机会见到。
四通联想浪潮是在电视上看到的广告。四通的比较科幻，霹雳贝贝风格，看完了以为四通的人都是外星人派来的。联想好像是“人类没有联想，世界将会怎样”，比较傻。浪潮是一个大浪打过来，然后是“浪潮0520，如何如何”，一直也不明白0520是什么意思。
然后就是SCO了，电视台有个SCO UNIX的讲座，我那会对跟电脑搭边的东西都特别感兴趣，苦于没有机会接触电脑。于是盯着这个讲座连续学了好几期。记得第一讲是讲“ls”的用法，讲了几十分钟。想来这个讲座也是针对企业中使用SCO UNIX的用户，因为从那之后的十几年里我没用过SCO UNIX，甚至认识的人里也没有用过SCO UNIX。所谓学习，就是把电视上讲的内容，记到纸上，想象如果我坐到电脑前，应该怎么使用这些命令。
对SCO一直有莫名的好感，因为那些记在纸上学到的命令和概念在我几年之后在大学里接触学习SUN III工作站的时候上手比别人快了一些。
这种好感一直延续到SCO和Linux打官司之前。
现在可倒好，官司失败了，SCO也流落到破产保护的境地。
有一哥们一直用root登录使用fedora，但是auto login不能以root自动登录，这哥们居然给linux kernel mailinglist发了一个邮件如下：
Dear whoever is in charge of writing fedora core 7,
The auto login is a wonderful feature. However, there is a HUGE flaw in
it at the moment. It won’t let me log in a root that way. That is MY
decision, not YOUR decision. Please fix it in an update!!! I’m sick of
having to log in as root every single time I use my computer. I
understand that there are situation where people have other people use
their computer and don’t want them to be root. However, I never want to
be logged in as anything other than root, and I suspect everyone who has
half a brain is the exact same way. Honestly, have you ever been logged
in as someone other than root? You absolutely can do nothing on the
machine. For those who make the argument that someone logged in as root
might break the machine by doing something they shouldn’t, I would say
it’s already broken without being root. You cannot mount drives, edit
anything about how the /etc directory is setup, or do many other things
that everyone I know does on a regular basis. IN general, there are
times when you are logged in as a non-root user when it will ask you for
a password. That is so inconvenient when you are the only one who uses
your own computer. PLEASE get root auto login as an option. No one but
me has to set it up this way, but please give ME the option.
Thank You,
几个人就他的错误行为给出了简短的回复，例如给fedora提bug之类的。
也有人比较刻薄，回复如下：
Hint 1: If you’re not smart enough to figure out how to fix your system so that
it does what you want, you’re not smart enough to run as root all the time.
Hint 2: You’re posting to a kernel list about a non-kernel problem. See hint 1.
结果另一人跟着回复如下：
>Hint 1: If you’re not smart enough to figure out how to fix your system so that
>it does what you want, you’re not smart enough to run as root all the time.
yum install smart
居然会自动生成跟邮件列表名称相关的subject和附件。虽然内容还是垃圾
[Ltp-coverage] Technical_Analysis-ltp-coverage Inbox ltp-coverage
Reply
Reply to all Reply to allForward Forward Print Add rhadona to Contacts list Delete this message Report phishing Show original Message text garbled?
rhadona Renfroe
to ltp-coverage
show details
7:32 am (3 hours ago)
————————————————————————-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Ltp-coverage mailing list
Ltp-coverage@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-coverage
Technical_Analysis-ltp-coverage.pdf
13K View as HTML Download